<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Illusion of Religion:  Illusion, Entertainment and Religion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.the-atheist.com/the-illusion-of-religion-illusion-entertainment-and-religion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.the-atheist.com/the-illusion-of-religion-illusion-entertainment-and-religion/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:49:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vir Narain</title>
		<link>http://www.the-atheist.com/the-illusion-of-religion-illusion-entertainment-and-religion/#comment-404</link>
		<dc:creator>Vir Narain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 03:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-atheist.com/?p=55#comment-404</guid>
		<description>Re. &quot;“One of the key differences between Atheists and Non-Atheists is that Atheists almost always have a critical sceptic hat on.”&quot; This description perhaps better fits agnostics.  Scepticsim must also at times turn inwards, but Atheists are too cocksure of their position.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re. &#8220;“One of the key differences between Atheists and Non-Atheists is that Atheists almost always have a critical sceptic hat on.”&#8221; This description perhaps better fits agnostics.  Scepticsim must also at times turn inwards, but Atheists are too cocksure of their position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Baker</title>
		<link>http://www.the-atheist.com/the-illusion-of-religion-illusion-entertainment-and-religion/#comment-403</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 05:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-atheist.com/?p=55#comment-403</guid>
		<description>&quot;One of the key differences between Atheists and Non-Atheists is that Atheists almost always have a critical sceptic hat on.&quot;

Yes, that&#039;s the basic problem. It&#039;s one thing to have one&#039;s eyes open and not just fall for the first trick in town, but quite another to be a sceptic through and through. It is quite inhuman.

I don&#039;t read the Bible that much, and regret it. However when I do, I certainly don&#039;t take it at &quot;face value.&quot; I am aware that there are many literary devices throughout the text, and that, for example, in just describing something, the author is not necessarily condoning it. But then nor do I read the Bible as if the writer is trying to trick me and con me into something that I would normally never buy into. If you can&#039;t read the Gospels and see there a simple story told by someone certainly who believed it, but also someone who was being quite sincere and honest, you are being &lt;i&gt;too&lt;/i&gt; sceptical. There is no attempt to &quot;smooth over&quot; difficulties or misunderstandings - quite the contrary, these are highlighted!

Religion is part of everyone&#039;s search to understand why there is something and not nothing. Why is there meaning in the universe? Is there life after death? Is there a God? Does he love us, or why else would he have created us...? etc...etc...

Most people become believers from the testimony of lives that have touched them deeply. I&#039;ll save you some time: of course Churches are designed with art and so on to offer insights into the ultimate questions. (In fact the reason there&#039;s very little good art around today is because these questions themselves are being stifled by a noisy society that is desperate to block them out and can&#039;t).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;One of the key differences between Atheists and Non-Atheists is that Atheists almost always have a critical sceptic hat on.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, that&#8217;s the basic problem. It&#8217;s one thing to have one&#8217;s eyes open and not just fall for the first trick in town, but quite another to be a sceptic through and through. It is quite inhuman.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t read the Bible that much, and regret it. However when I do, I certainly don&#8217;t take it at &#8220;face value.&#8221; I am aware that there are many literary devices throughout the text, and that, for example, in just describing something, the author is not necessarily condoning it. But then nor do I read the Bible as if the writer is trying to trick me and con me into something that I would normally never buy into. If you can&#8217;t read the Gospels and see there a simple story told by someone certainly who believed it, but also someone who was being quite sincere and honest, you are being <i>too</i> sceptical. There is no attempt to &#8220;smooth over&#8221; difficulties or misunderstandings &#8211; quite the contrary, these are highlighted!</p>
<p>Religion is part of everyone&#8217;s search to understand why there is something and not nothing. Why is there meaning in the universe? Is there life after death? Is there a God? Does he love us, or why else would he have created us&#8230;? etc&#8230;etc&#8230;</p>
<p>Most people become believers from the testimony of lives that have touched them deeply. I&#8217;ll save you some time: of course Churches are designed with art and so on to offer insights into the ultimate questions. (In fact the reason there&#8217;s very little good art around today is because these questions themselves are being stifled by a noisy society that is desperate to block them out and can&#8217;t).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

