Comments on: Taking the hit for us. Pictures from the Creationist Museum http://www.the-atheist.com/taking-the-hit-for-us-pictures-from-the-creationist-museum/ Just another WordPress site Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:49:24 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: acey4utosay http://www.the-atheist.com/taking-the-hit-for-us-pictures-from-the-creationist-museum/#comment-308 acey4utosay Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:39:23 +0000 http://www.the-atheist.com/taking-the-hit-for-us-pictures-from-the-creationist-museum/#comment-308 That's just shameful. Creationists use such twisted logic to make their explanations fit with their crude beliefs, when the real answer is beautifully simplistic: evolution by means of natural selection. In addition, ask them this question about Noah's Ark: How do you account for all of the insects? There are approximately 5,000 dragonfly species, 2,000 praying mantis, 20,000 grasshopper, 170,000 butterfly and moth, 120,000 fly, 82,000 true bug, 360,000 beetle, and 110,000 bee, wasp and ant species described to date. Estimates of the total number of current species, including those not yet known to science, range from two million to fifty million, with newer studies favouring a lower figure of about six to ten million. /sigh That’s just shameful. Creationists use such twisted logic to make their explanations fit with their crude beliefs, when the real answer is beautifully simplistic: evolution by means of natural selection.

In addition, ask them this question about Noah’s Ark: How do you account for all of the insects?

There are approximately 5,000 dragonfly species, 2,000 praying mantis, 20,000 grasshopper, 170,000 butterfly and moth, 120,000 fly, 82,000 true bug, 360,000 beetle, and 110,000 bee, wasp and ant species described to date. Estimates of the total number of current species, including those not yet known to science, range from two million to fifty million, with newer studies favouring a lower figure of about six to ten million.

/sigh

]]>