Comments on: Psychics, Mediums and Liars, Oh My! http://www.the-atheist.com/psychics-mediums-and-liars-oh-my/ Just another WordPress site Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:49:24 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Ricky Payne http://www.the-atheist.com/psychics-mediums-and-liars-oh-my/#comment-1297 Ricky Payne Wed, 18 Aug 2010 00:20:20 +0000 http://www.the-atheist.com/?p=274#comment-1297 Peter gore seer, you make me laugh. I just stumbled on this site after looking around for science news. 1) Remote viewing was studied by both the Soviet union and the United states during the cold war. The results of those studies are actually now in the public domain, I have seen the experimental data and it shows no results that are significantly above chance. Just google stargate project. Just like many other believers, you flat out lie about these 'secret studies' that show ESP to exist. This is flat out false. The opposite is true. All studies ever conducted dont show any significant evidence beyond what which would be expected with guess work. The Dr Rhine experiments are a favorite with believers because early on in the experiment the results DID start to exceed the expectation of chance. Further study showed that this was an anomolous blip however and the experiments soon fell to normal levels. If you want to see the modern-day ESP research, look no further than Harvard university. Researchers have since 2008 been using neuroimaging to study the brains responses to supposed Extra sensory stimulus. These studies are the strongest evidence yet, against the existance of ESP. There has been no evidence that the brain responds to anything other than physical stimulus. Google it and top harrassing people on this site with your uninformed bullshit. Peter gore seer, you make me laugh. I just stumbled on this site after looking around for science news. 1) Remote viewing was studied by both the Soviet union and the United states during the cold war. The results of those studies are actually now in the public domain, I have seen the experimental data and it shows no results that are significantly above chance. Just google stargate project. Just like many other believers, you flat out lie about these ‘secret studies’ that show ESP to exist. This is flat out false. The opposite is true. All studies ever conducted dont show any significant evidence beyond what which would be expected with guess work. The Dr Rhine experiments are a favorite with believers because early on in the experiment the results DID start to exceed the expectation of chance. Further study showed that this was an anomolous blip however and the experiments soon fell to normal levels. If you want to see the modern-day ESP research, look no further than Harvard university. Researchers have since 2008 been using neuroimaging to study the brains responses to supposed Extra sensory stimulus. These studies are the strongest evidence yet, against the existance of ESP. There has been no evidence that the brain responds to anything other than physical stimulus. Google it and top harrassing people on this site with your uninformed bullshit.

]]> By: Peter gore seer http://www.the-atheist.com/psychics-mediums-and-liars-oh-my/#comment-1112 Peter gore seer Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:13:03 +0000 http://www.the-atheist.com/?p=274#comment-1112 You are right John W psychic ability is ridiculous.I find it funny you have been funding it ror 20 years in your taxes. You are right John W psychic ability is ridiculous.I find it funny you have been funding it ror 20 years in your taxes.

]]> By: John W http://www.the-atheist.com/psychics-mediums-and-liars-oh-my/#comment-1111 John W Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:59:50 +0000 http://www.the-atheist.com/?p=274#comment-1111 The idea of pyschic ability is utterly ridicoulous. Nice website though The idea of pyschic ability is utterly ridicoulous. Nice website though

]]> By: Peter gore seer http://www.the-atheist.com/psychics-mediums-and-liars-oh-my/#comment-1110 Peter gore seer Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:09:07 +0000 http://www.the-atheist.com/?p=274#comment-1110 I would like this website to take REMOT VEIWING and make it a topic on this sit it would be vary interesting coment. I would like this website to take REMOT VEIWING and make it a topic on this sit it would be vary interesting coment.

]]> By: Peter gore seer http://www.the-atheist.com/psychics-mediums-and-liars-oh-my/#comment-1109 Peter gore seer Fri, 12 Feb 2010 05:20:22 +0000 http://www.the-atheist.com/?p=274#comment-1109 PSYCIC abilities have been and are been used by RUSSIAN and CHINA since the sixties it was leaked to AMARICA so BRITAIN got in on the idea.They have been trying to make a mind weapon that would work over large distances. But they could not used it to a significant weapon.However the PENTIGON have built layers of lead round the building to prevent mind control influences.And scientist have admitted its existence the name is remote viewing.And there are many books which uphold my claims mind control is one so the paranormal does exist.One day it could be used as a weapon only time will tell.And I do apologise for my righting but I am dyslexic. PSYCIC abilities have been and are been used by RUSSIAN and CHINA since the sixties it was leaked to AMARICA so BRITAIN got in on the idea.They have been trying to make a mind weapon that would work over large distances. But they could not used it to a significant weapon.However the PENTIGON have built layers of lead round the building to prevent mind control influences.And scientist have admitted its existence the name is remote viewing.And there are many books which uphold my claims mind control is one so the paranormal does exist.One day it could be used as a weapon only time will tell.And I do apologise for my righting but I am dyslexic.

]]> By: If I were religious, this would insult me http://www.the-atheist.com/psychics-mediums-and-liars-oh-my/#comment-1108 If I were religious, this would insult me Sun, 01 Nov 2009 23:54:31 +0000 http://www.the-atheist.com/?p=274#comment-1108 [...] there are certainly those who are more gullible than others.  I’ve written previously about psychics and mediums, and the way they exploit certain members of our society (and there were some fantastic comments on that post by people who had been taken in by those [...] [...] there are certainly those who are more gullible than others.  I’ve written previously about psychics and mediums, and the way they exploit certain members of our society (and there were some fantastic comments on that post by people who had been taken in by those [...]

]]> By: Peter gore seer http://www.the-atheist.com/psychics-mediums-and-liars-oh-my/#comment-1107 Peter gore seer Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:28:33 +0000 http://www.the-atheist.com/?p=274#comment-1107 Dear Sarah You may never see a ghost they see you stay away from paranormal it can be very dangerous.And affect you mind I am a Seer it affected my mind and my family but it also brought me to god put you faith in god. Dear Sarah You may never see a ghost they see you stay away from paranormal it can be very dangerous.And affect you mind I am a Seer it affected my mind and my family but it also brought me to god put you faith in god.

]]> By: Al Lane http://www.the-atheist.com/psychics-mediums-and-liars-oh-my/#comment-1106 Al Lane Sun, 25 Oct 2009 21:45:29 +0000 http://www.the-atheist.com/?p=274#comment-1106 How do you explain when I get information that is right on the money (as you wish for me to do)? One of the questions that need to be raised in not about right or wrong answers, but about how mediums DO receive answers. This is a questions that no one seems to be even remotely interested in even begin to hazard an answer. Atheists and agnotics believe that mediums are always incorrect. That's is a nice pat answer, but the problem is what do YOU do with correct replies to questions. If you believe that we are not always wrong, where do we receive the answers? Who (or what) controls those replies? Al How do you explain when I get information that is right on the money (as you wish for me to do)?

One of the questions that need to be raised in not about right or wrong answers, but about how mediums DO receive answers. This is a questions that no one seems to be even remotely interested in even begin to hazard an answer.

Atheists and agnotics believe that mediums are always incorrect. That’s is a nice pat answer, but the problem is what do YOU do with correct replies to questions.

If you believe that we are not always wrong, where do we receive the answers? Who (or what) controls those replies?
Al

]]> By: The Atheist http://www.the-atheist.com/psychics-mediums-and-liars-oh-my/#comment-1105 The Atheist Sun, 25 Oct 2009 21:09:50 +0000 http://www.the-atheist.com/?p=274#comment-1105 Al, there have been numerous experiments and challenges to those who believe they have psychic abilities and it has yet to be proven. And it's not as if there's isn't <a href="http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/1m-challenge.html" rel="nofollow">an incentive</a>. How do you explain the times when you get things wrong? And why you personally, or one of your peers, haven't claimed the Randi prize? Al, there have been numerous experiments and challenges to those who believe they have psychic abilities and it has yet to be proven. And it’s not as if there’s isn’t an incentive.

How do you explain the times when you get things wrong? And why you personally, or one of your peers, haven’t claimed the Randi prize?

]]> By: Peter gore seer http://www.the-atheist.com/psychics-mediums-and-liars-oh-my/#comment-1104 Peter gore seer Sat, 24 Oct 2009 05:35:28 +0000 http://www.the-atheist.com/?p=274#comment-1104 Peter gore seer Dear Sarah Priest do know there is a god they are pick by god thay to have free will to choose thay choose to serve god and man. Peter gore seer Dear Sarah Priest do know there is a god they are pick by god thay to have free will to choose thay choose to serve god and man.

]]>